When the Nepalis Know the Truth, They'll Hate Us

Murder at the Palace
By JOSEPH PIETRI

What really happened the night of June 1, 2001 at the Palace? Was the coup engineered by the Bush administration? In the days before the massacre a team of Muscular Americans were observed at the Hyatt Hotel in Boudha. They told everyone that they were their building a hospital in Patan but in the days after the massacre they left Nepal never to be seen again.

It was reported that the Black Prince was in Pokhara taking care of his conservation projects. The reality is he was at the Kathmandu airport awaiting the news of his coup. The Crown Prince was all ready arrested and taken to Balaju Army barracks. Prince Paras and Military Officers carried out the assassinations at the Palace. There was a tremendous shoot out at the Palace between King Birendra's staff and Paras and his assassins. Helicopters were observed all night taking bodies of Birendra's staff and dumping them in rivers along the border. This I know as well: anyone having any first hand knowledge of this is either dead or out of Nepal.

Those who did make it out live in fear.

Gyanendra waited at the airport while Paras did the dirty work and in case the coup did not succeed he planned on escaping from there. The Crown Prince was kept alive until after his father was killed. Then he was executed by the military. He was kept as a bargaining chip by the Military Officers involved in the coup in the case it did not succeed they would bargain the Crown Prince's life for exile.

Were the Americans just observers, or did they take part in this obviously well engineered plot?

The British and the Indian governments must have been in on it as well, but made sure they distanced themselves from the actual event. After all India is a Hindu country and Birendra a Hindu king, and there is a long relationship between Nepal and England and both royal families.

King Birendra never unleashed the Royal Nepalese Army on the Maoists and the gains they made led to the Coup. Gyanendra had the support of the military and the blessings of the Bush and Blair administrations as well as the Indian Government. Again they are now building a road from the Indian border to Lo Mothang. Lo Mothang on the Tibetan plateau bordering China was the jump off point for American-trained Tibetan guerillas fighting the Chinese. The CIA maintained a base there throughout the 1960s and 1970s--the Tibetan plateau being perfect for a forward airbase against China in the future.

Gyanendra is the Saddam Hussein of Nepal who killed his own brothers and family so he could be King. It's time for the awful truth to be known and our Governments part in it must be exposed. This is another chapter in our bloody history and again we have supported a heroin-dealing murderous despot/king/dictator.

I will all ways love Nepal and have many fond memories of my youth there and I am ashamed of what is obviously my own country's hand in this murderous affair in the land of Lord Buddha. American foreign policy has ruined Nepal. The thought of B 52s based in the land of temples makes me shudder.

This is how we create Osamas; this is how we create terrorism; this is how we create hatred for America. Say what you must against Birendra, the Nepali people loved their King and Queen and when they come to know the truth they will hate us for our part in this tragedy,

Jai Nepal! Free Nepal!


-------------------------------------------
http://www.Nepal123.com

oh by the way,

i copied and pasted it from :- http://www.counterpunch.org/pietri03052005.html

You are talented and great at finding good writing. By the way this is the 10th time someone's posted this message here. I'm about to puke.

I remember just a month or two ago...so many people were showing great zeal and fervor supporting gyanendra's move to seize power....It is bad situation when you turn to someone who murdered his own brother to ensure your safety....he doesnt give a fuk bout his brother, Nepal, no one...and he will continue to do as he pleases cause no one can do anything against him with the army by his side...but look at the alternative: greedypoliticians who care more about bribery, extortion and getting money through unscrupulous deeds rather than the country's welfare...and the last alternative: maoists who kill defenseless people in remote villages to prove themselves as a threat...since they do not have have the courage to harm a hair on the king's head...

The king is corrupt, and a dictator, he has taken over in an illegal coup,
He has no right to rule as he is from a serial killer's family, unlike most politicians
India is richer than Nepal, and Bhutan as it is a democratic republic,.
The king will offer alliances with any side, Pakistan's islamists, China's communists, China's

Capitalists, and India's Hindus, and Communists, in a mercenary satanic attitude, that

forgets the rights of Hindus in Pakistan or Nepalese, in the BJP, the king is from a serial

killer's family,
Overthrow him,
Declare a republic in Nepal
I support democracy it is the best system,
The king was able to take power, as Nepal's government did not have power,
i.e. the Maoists, could not take over in a coup, so why could a apparently powerless king,
also many hate the king as a corrupt, source of cash, living in a palace, which used to have a

harem, he is a serf owner, and arrests decent child rights campaigners, and socialists, while

freeing murderers, and committing murders
Monarchy has killed more people in the twentieth century than Communism, when you include the

flu epidemic of 199, and the world war one, etc, etc,
You claim politicians are corrupt, but in what way, they are not as corrupt as king or such,

who live in a palaces, and own factories,
the war upped the last time the king took over, and has again,
and under him, the economy slowed down for the first time in decades
there was also a Maoist revolt in the 1970s, which saw deaths, and riot kills,
the king has never allowed democracy,
every mistake it makes he jumps on, Nepal has more child labourers and serfs per head than any

is as they do not take all the credit even in Britain Churchill did not get al the credit for winning ww2, or fdr but in ussr Stalin claimed it all, and kings claim all credit, and blame advisors for all failings,

if you compared on eon one the king with any politician the king would be worst, as he killed so many, and saw so many deaths in his 3 year stint in power, and has lost so many allies, so its 'thje politicians. And a alien invader style hatred of human rights, activists, , never a particular one, only the stereotype, and that is a made up person
if monarchists hate human rights so much they should be treated like animals,

while the king like Japan's
emperor in ww2, fights for himself, and his image, then pretends, nowt was his fault,
and has killed many,
If 10 years of democracy were a failure, what about the 3 years in the middle of that, of

dictatorship when most people died. and what about the fact Nepal was so poor under the

monarchy, there were revolts in the 1970s, and oppression and famines, democracy would have

worked if it had power, not the king, remember the Maoists could not launch a coup in a day,

how could a apparently powerless king, who was not even liked. because Nepal, was not allowed

democracy as it was not a democracy it must be to save it, from China, of which he is becoming

the finger puppet of, Pakistan and the king,. who is Dracula d and Ivan the terrible

remember in the 20th century more people died of royalist ww1, and it’s flu epidemic, and king Leopold, than under communism, and the worst communist regime, which I shall not mention was a fusion of that most evil ideal, of monarchists and communists, and was ousted by the sort of communists who the Maoists are, remember the communists saved Europe from Hitler, and also it is worse than democracy, but the most successful system is democracy, and both are better than murderous royalty,

which are the worst royalties on earth, (a) Saudi Arabia, which caused the civil war in Sudan by making it’s secular socialists impose sharia law ion the S, and by forcing in an islamist group into their coalition, guaranteeing that the government had to keep with it, and by buying land which disposseded peasants and forced them to revolt, and join the rebellion, and it cause the Algerian war, by funding the isalmist groups, that started the civil war, and caused the Yemeni civil war, and the Somali civil war, Afghanistan’s recent post-soviet wars, none of these wars helped anybody and they did not even help islam, as they paid saddam to invade iran, and also created bin laden, whether in the same way Ulster protestants created the iran, by hating catholics, or by the way that maybe they did actually create him, and they still arrest maids, who escape from their contracts early, and make them work, even unpaid, and they fund corrupt British Prime ministers children, like Mark Thatcher, and they still have the last vestige of slavery where they see in mecca Ethiopians, are bought as slaves, which does not happen in Ethiopia to pay for visits to mecca, and costs, and they buy livers from Egypt off poor mad people, who then have it given to richj Saudi drunks, who often own harems, this does not happen in any other muslim land, it is not Islam’s fault. It is monarchy’s,
which is the second, worst
b) Nepal, the poorest and lowest life expectancy in s-asia, only Bhutan was poorer before the king took over, in the years of king’s rule, 7000 people died, in the 7 years of democratic rule, 3000, and it was falling,. In the 1970s there were commie revolts which killed many, so the revolts did not start under the democracy, and increased under monarchy, it has highest slavery and bonded labour, and child labour on earth, and deports Tibetan,

© SWAZILAND ITS KING KILLS, PEOPLE, AND HAS SEEN HIMSELF SAY ALL VIRGINS must PaRADE NAKED IN FRONT OF HIM EVERY YEAR, HE CHOOSES THE MOST ATTRACTIVE AS ANOTEHYR OF HIS WIVES, even if tehy are allready about to marry someone else,
AND SPENDS THE ENTIRE BUDGET, raised from these wronged men, ON THEM, they then leave, to other lands, fleeing this jabba the hut, and he finds more wives, he has had 25, since coming to power, and he then tries to punish teh families of thsoe wives, and even the wives,
and he then blames politicians, who have no power what so ever,
even when he purchases, wait for it, buying him an airplane, worth millions which they will be barred from using, heee ehheheh , he blames them, ahahhaha, it s laughable, how awful monarchists are, which he will use, yes he blames politicians for this, anyway as of this, this absolutist dictator then has seen his land now have the highest hiv rate on earth, so of course the lowest life expectancy, in the unbiased socialist life expectancy tables,
All because it is a monarchy, having a royalty ruling is just like having ant dictators ruling, except other dictators are normally less gfreedy, and coerruopt and thiock, and stupid, and less enterenched in power,

(D) Dracula, he killed more people of his own country than any in the 20th Century, even that royal-communist regime, well maybe withy the expetion of areas the nazis, ruled, and parts of Belgian royal congo, very evil,

(e) Ghenghis khan, I am sure you know all about him, as you are ruled by a king, and he obviously tells of how evil and degenerate they are,

(f) Bhutan the king has evicted over 20% of his country since 1990, in evictions of nepalese who came in the late 19thc and teh war of 2003, when he invaded forces he had allowed to saty in bhutan but was force dto evict thenm uinder indian threats in taht year, which meant moere peopl have died per head in Bhutanese wars in 200-2004, tghan in nepalese democracy 1990-91 and more than in india per head too, and it is poorer thania,. and has a lower life expecancty and only banned slavery in 1993, after a revolt in 1989, and arrests dissidents and steals teh best jobs for teh elite,

(g) kaiser he killed 75million people by causeing world war one, and it's flu epidemic, meaning monarchy killed more than communism, and only a bit less than far right dictatorships, which include som sdemi-monarchies, and constituional rightsist monarchies, and empires, etc etc, in teh 20th century,
that is that nepal must be a republic



well kings create evil, and pain and misery
face it, Kyrgyz, Lebanese, and such should own Nepal, if Nepalis can’t have democracy, or republics, someone else will, and won’t be threatening monarchy or dictatorship, unlike Nepal, Nepalis are not monkeys they can handle democracy

Long live the republic, long live the socialist state.
Down with monarchy, up with republics, up with democracy

ifsikkim can be a democracy why not nepal,

ther eis nothing wrong with what you call liek a clingon guy hugh man rites, if you oppose them you should e be trated liek an animal

This not only the stage work of a murder but the framework of a cartel of drug. If you have ever paid the visit of a RNA officer's home, you will see how luxuriously he lives with his wife! He gets one PIPA for his wife and her PETICOAT washing!

How could they can afford such luxurios living in the poor of the poorest countries in the world?

The answer is the framework of drug cartel the prince G then? RNA was and still involved in the drug trafficing for drug lords of the world. If this book and stories has some link with this truth then it makes sense. Otherwise vocus story book.

Prince G then was in the drug cartel list of the INTERPOLL and King Birendra wanted to investigate the information that some member of the Royal family is involve in the international drug trafficing. This message was passed to King Birenda. Also, the King Birendra wanted Parus to face the justice for the puplic morder that he had committed.

THE TRUTH IS THAT IT IS LONG WAY TO GO FOR NEPAL AND NEPALESE WHO LOVE THE BEAUTY OF THIER COUNTRY WITH HIMALAYAS TO FIND JUSTICE AND ESTABLISH DEMOCRACY THAT CAN SEE THE TRUTH TRANSPARENTLY.

THE CURSE THAT NEPAL HAVE FROM HER PAST HISTORY THAT IT IS VERY HARD FOR HER TO FIND CLEAN AND LOVING KING LIKE BIRENDA ANYMORE. CLEAN AND PURE HAERTED STATESMEN IN NEPAL ALWAYS GET MORDERED BY THE ARMY.

IT IS TRUE THAT RNA COULD NOT PROTECT OUR BELOVED KING BIRENDA AND HIS FAMILY FROM THE TYRANT DICTATOR MURDER PRINCE G AND HIS SON PARAS THE MONSTER.

when the neplease knoe the truth they'll hate us>>>>>
one line is better than this... u all wanna know which ?
"WHEN THE OUR CHILDS N' GRAND CHILDS KNOW THE TRUTH THEY'LL HATE US N' THEY'LL SPLIT ON OUR PICTURES" coz' haami harule k hi garna sakenau ni ta (about that ugly case)
its pinch me :-(((((((

All king are same, why do you think Birendra was great and Gyanendra is not.

Maoist = RNA - King
Nepali leader = Stupid + Corrupted + Inexperience + Selfish ? Patriotic
King Gyanendra = King Birendra + Tricks (Kapati) + Selfish
Prince Paras = Prince Dipendra + Murderer
Queen Komal = Queen Aiswarya ? Poet ? Politics

Let us all try to prove this demon is not a hindu but a muslim Shah and all will follow automatically.

Sounds very promising but will not excite the fanatic Hindus in Nepal and India. King G has strong hold on and supports from Hindu fanatics. Even the followers of liberal sage Khapada Baba XGeneral Bharat Keshari Singh and others do support King G despite what he did in the past. Once you become the king of Nepal by hook or crook you are the Hindu king and all fanatic Hindus will with no question supprt him. Most of the fanatic Hindus are middle and well off class people of Nepal and India.

Nepal is in the fire of socio-political and socio-economic agony and death. Everyday 7 Nepali are being killed by the conflict. I wish Hindu king and Gods and Goddess spell the magic upon the fire to extiguise.

what sort of Hindu king allies with Ismalmic Natiuons of Pakistan, which oppresses it's only Hindus, what sort of Huindu king allies with Indonesia, whose kings all became Muslims, in eth 17thCm, and kileld theri Hindus,
i tell you a king who kilsl his own family, and is a murdrer
A fiedn and a demon and a terroror king

The king is corrupt, and a dictator, he has taken over in an illegal coup,
He has no right to rule as he is from a serial killer's family, unlike most politicians, and probabaly is teh serial killer who killed members of his own family network,
India is richer than Nepal, and Bhutan as it is a democratic republic,.
The king will offer alliances with any side, Pakistan's islamists, China's communists, China's,
Capitalists, and India's Hindus, and Communists, in a mercenary satanic attitude, that

forgets the rights of Hindus in Pakistan or Nepalese, in the BJP,, all mutually incompatable, exept for a mercenary,

Overthrow him,
Declare a republic in Nepal
I support democracy it is the best system,
The king was able to take power, as Nepal's government did not have power,
i.e. the Maoists, could not take over in a coup, so why could a apparently powerless king,
also many hate the king as a corrupt, source of cash, living in a palace, which used to have a

harem, he is a serf owner, and arrests decent child rights campaigners, and socialists, while

freeing murderers, and committing murders
Monarchy has killed more people in the twentieth century than Communism, when you include the

flu epidemic of 199, and the world war one, etc, etc,
You claim politicians are corrupt, but in what way, they are not as corrupt as king or such,

who live in a palaces, and own factories,
the war upped the last time the king took over, and has again,
and under him, the economy slowed down for the first time in decades
there was also a Maoist revolt in the 1970s, which saw deaths, and riot kills,
the king has never allowed democracy,
every mistake it makes he jumps on, Nepal has more child labourers and serfs per head than any

is as they do not take all the credit even in Britain Churchill did not get al the credit for winning ww2, or fdr but in ussr Stalin claimed it all, and kings claim all credit, and blame advisors for all failings,

if you compared on eon one the king with any politician the king would be worst, as he killed so many, and saw so many deaths in his 3 year stint in power, and has lost so many allies, so its ?thje politicians. And a alien invader style hatred of human rights, activists, , never a particular one, only the stereotype, and that is a made up person
if monarchists hate human rights so much they should be treated like animals,

while the king like Japan?s
emperor in ww2, fights for himself, and his image, then pretends, nowt was his fault,
and has killed many,
If 10 years of democracy were a failure, what about the 3 years in the middle of that, of

dictatorship when most people died. and what about the fact Nepal was so poor under the

monarchy, there were revolts in the 1970s, and oppression and famines, democracy would have

worked if it had power, not the king, remember the Maoists could not launch a coup in a day,

how could a apparently powerless king, who was not even liked. because Nepal, was not allowed

democracy as it was not a democracy it must be to save it, from China, of which he is becoming

the finger puppet of, Pakistan and the king,. who is Dracula d and Ivan the terrible

remember in the 20th century more people died of royalist ww1, and it?s flu epidemic, and king Leopold, than under communism, and the worst communist regime, which I shall not mention was a fusion of that most evil ideal, of monarchists and communists, and was ousted by the sort of communists who the Maoists are, remember the communists saved Europe from Hitler, and also it is worse than democracy, but the most successful system is democracy, and both are better than murderous royalty,

which are the worst royalties on earth, (a) Saudi Arabia, which caused the civil war in Sudan by making it?s secular socialists impose sharia law ion the S, and by forcing in an islamist group into their coalition, guaranteeing that the government had to keep with it, and by buying land which disposseded peasants and forced them to revolt, and join the rebellion, and it cause the Algerian war, by funding the isalmist groups, that started the civil war, and caused the Yemeni civil war, and the Somali civil war, Afghanistan?s recent post-soviet wars, none of these wars helped anybody and they did not even help islam, as they paid saddam to invade iran, and also created bin laden, whether in the same way Ulster protestants created the iran, by hating catholics, or by the way that maybe they did actually create him, and they still arrest maids, who escape from their contracts early, and make them work, even unpaid, and they fund corrupt British Prime ministers children, like Mark Thatcher, and they still have the last vestige of slavery where they see in mecca Ethiopians, are bought as slaves, which does not happen in Ethiopia to pay for visits to mecca, and costs, and they buy livers from Egypt off poor mad people, who then have it given to richj Saudi drunks, who often own harems, this does not happen in any other muslim land, it is not Islam?s fault. It is monarchy?s,
which is the second, worst
b) Nepal, the poorest and lowest life expectancy in s-asia, only Bhutan was poorer before the king took over, in the years of king?s rule, 7000 people died, in the 7 years of democratic rule, 3000, and it was falling,. In the 1970s there were commie revolts which killed many, so the revolts did not start under the democracy, and increased under monarchy, it has highest slavery and bonded labour, and child labour on earth, and deports Tibetan,

? SWAZILAND ITS KING KILLS, PEOPLE, AND HAS SEEN HIMSELF SAY ALL VIRGINS must PaRADE NAKED IN FRONT OF HIM EVERY YEAR, HE CHOOSES THE MOST ATTRACTIVE AS ANOTEHYR OF HIS WIVES, even if tehy are allready about to marry someone else,
AND SPENDS THE ENTIRE BUDGET, raised from these wronged men, ON THEM, they then leave, to other lands, fleeing this jabba the hut, and he finds more wives, he has had 25, since coming to power, and he then tries to punish teh families of thsoe wives, and even the wives,
and he then blames politicians, who have no power what so ever,
even when he purchases, wait for it, buying him an airplane, worth millions which they will be barred from using, heee ehheheh , he blames them, ahahhaha, it s laughable, how awful monarchists are, which he will use, yes he blames politicians for this, anyway as of this, this absolutist dictator then has seen his land now have the highest hiv rate on earth, so of course the lowest life expectancy, in the unbiased socialist life expectancy tables,
All because it is a monarchy, having a royalty ruling is just like having ant dictators ruling, except other dictators are normally less gfreedy, and coerruopt and thiock, and stupid, and less enterenched in power,

(D) Dracula, he killed more people of his own country than any in the 20th Century, even that royal-communist regime, well maybe withy the expetion of areas the nazis, ruled, and parts of Belgian royal congo, very evil,

(e) Ghenghis khan, I am sure you know all about him, as you are ruled by a king, and he obviously tells of how evil and degenerate they are,

(f) Bhutan the king has evicted over 20% of his country since 1990, in evictions of nepalese who came in the late 19thc and teh war of 2003, when he invaded forces he had allowed to saty in bhutan but was force dto evict thenm uinder indian threats in taht year, which meant moere peopl have died per head in Bhutanese wars in 200-2004, tghan in nepalese democracy 1990-91 and more than in india per head too, and it is poorer thania,. and has a lower life expecancty and only banned slavery in 1993, after a revolt in 1989, and arrests dissidents and steals the best jobs for the elite, and royal evil family, who steal cash from, tax, but iof a lower class member gets charity , they are condemmed, in evil unfairness

(g) kaiser he killed 75million people by causeing world war one, and it's flu epidemic, meaning monarchy killed more than communism, and only a bit less than far right dictatorships, which include some semi-monarchies, and constituional rightsist monarchies, and empires, etc etc, in the 20th century,
that is that nepal must be a republic



well kings create evil, and pain and misery
all of them rule, as a few centuries ago, some horriblw arriors tookover the land, and became kingm, treating you r ancestors liek slaves, and saying only they matterm, and the otehrs do not,
they say care about the king but not trhe child labourerm or the human rights activist jailed,
none of these human righst activists killed their own families, or saw teh war up under them,
face it, Kyrgyz, Lebanese, and such should own Nepal, if Nepalis can?t have democracy, or republics, someone else will, and won?t be threatening monarchy or dictatorship, unlike Nepal, Nepalis are not monkeys they can handle democracy

Long live the republic, long live the socialist state.
Down with monarchy, up with republics, up with democracy

if sikkim can be a democracy why not nepal,

the reis nothing wrong with what you call like a clingon guy in star trek, hugh man rites, if you oppose them you should e be trated like an animalike yiou are going to eat human, for pie,
you sickos, l;ong live democracy, l.ong live the republic, of nepal
democrcay democracy democracy democracy democracy
democracy democracy democracy democracy democracy

Whenever I see them, I feel sick.