.
If a woman forces a man, it is seduction
If a man forces a woman, it a rape
.

.

Seduction: An act of winning the love or sexual favour of someone
Rape: Force (someone) to have sex against their will.

I think , the lexicon negates your belief !

May not be lexically, but sayami is practically true.

rape involves empowering someone

'empowering'?? or overpowering?

I guess Cerine meant 'overpowering' instead of 'empowering.
--Cowboy

that's what i meant

thank u for correcting me.. :-)

so u mean a man canNOT be overpowered? :P...course then can be. ask a 'Loote' like me:P

anyone who wants to RAPE me :

call -1-800-LooTe-Da-Hunk

LooTe

If a woman tries to rape me, I would say "No" just for name sake one time but would not try to prevent it physically. I would simply lie back and enjoy it.

Don't be surprised I am a pervert.
;P

It is not impossible to rape a man. We don't hear a lot about it not because it doesn't happen; but because not many men come forward and claim they have been raped. Guys can't control their erection and I don't think it implies consent all the time.
If a woman forces a man, it is still a rape. Just because men are easily seduced doesn’t mean they cannot be raped.

Rape means overpowering someone against the other's will or consent, usually in a sexual situation.

I think in today's world, it is not unusual for men to be raped, especially by other men. Many men are brutally sodomized - particularly young boys. Women may also be the perpetrators of rapist acts; however, women may rape in less violent ways than men do. I don't think women sodomize men, but I wouldn't be surprised if that has happened.

This posting is R-rated. Please read it at your own discretion.

Assuming rape is defined as forcing another person to submit to sex acts with realization of sexual intercourse.

Objective 1: To prove that it is possible for a man to rape a woman.

I take it you most of you all have watched R-rated movies and even porns.
Therefore I am gonna be using explicit words.

The law must have come from the following facts and two scenarios.

First of, a man is generally stronger than a woman physically unless it is the WWF star Chyna trying to plunder the manhood of the emaciated actor from that movie the New Guy.

Most of us know a woman's vagina is at slightly lubricated and with slight stimulation at places where she can find special feelings. It becomes like a well-oiled machine. So that part is ready to rock. Now comes the penis part, as long as it is in full-mast, it is ready to set sail too. So a man using his extra strength can easily nail a woman assuming it is actually a horny man trying to break the law.
QED

Objective 2: To prove that it is impossible for a woman to rape a man.

Unless the man really finds the wanna-be-rapist (woman) completely sexually attractive his penis is not going to become hard. Also, if the man already had had enough sex preceding the encounter, it will be quite hard to get a hard-on even if the attacker is quite sexy. Even if the man resorts to taking a rain-check on that, he could still oblige by going tongue-and-fingers on her, still no intercourse.
QED

O-kay! I don’t even know where to begin. Did you even prove your point?
A man can be raped by another man; I think everyone will agree with that. Rape is an act of force and not an act of sexual desire. A girl who repels you can turn you on, if she says and does the right thing. If she forces you into having sex, wouldn’t it be rape?
What about sodomy? Isn’t that an act of force?
The bottom line is men can and do get raped, whether the perpetrator is of same sex or not.

Please read my posting again.

I put an assumption on the meaning of the word "rape" where I have outlined that " the act results in the intercourse".
I was trying to come up with raw reasoning to the title of the thread.

A handsome/beautiful person like you talking about "sodomy" right before my late late lunch? Ewwww! You won't be sexually attractive to your would-be-lover if you continue talking like that. ;P
I do not want to even get into "man on man" or "man behind man" rape.
But I guess it's time to put a little clause in the definition of the word rather "forceful sex act upon the physically weaker person by the attacker unless the initiator ends up getting rape instead. LOL!

View/Share this post only