[VIEWED 4873
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
|
ctal
Please log in to subscribe to ctal's postings.
Posted on 11-09-08 5:08
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Bhutan was the only country where I had never paid any interest in the past to learn about its geography, culture, religion and politics. Today, I happened to click some clips about it in the YouTube and learnt that there are still some people who worship Bhutani king as we used to do long ago in our country. Hope Bhutan will get rid of these feudal monarchy and all of the Butanese refugees will be able to return to their country sometime soon.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcoQjoZ6toI&NR=1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1yWZ6j4W5A&NR=1
|
|
|
|
batas
Please log in to subscribe to batas's postings.
Posted on 11-09-08 5:42
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
ppl still worship KING ...............i may not worship but i respect him
having king is not bad .........but ya having bad king is misfortune
|
|
|
191karma
Please log in to subscribe to 191karma's postings.
Posted on 11-09-08 10:51
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I am not surprisedl. Bhutanese King serves his people well and he gets respect.Look at Bhutan on its way to produce 5000 MW by 2010 for 500k population.
Our Chor served his stomach only. So we kicked him out of narayanhiti. Now. ex king G is writing book. what a pathetic. we dont have 1,000 MW for 30 million nepali. R we not pathetic in comparison to Bhutan.
|
|
|
letsHaveFun
Please log in to subscribe to letsHaveFun's postings.
Posted on 11-10-08 5:21
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Bhutan is probably able to show to the world that their kings are still loved by people, particularly because it has a small population and it has been generally out of global influence. Remember, things like television broadcasting in Bhutan were started sometime in late 1990s. With the internal media under government control (with king's relatives as government chiefs) and limited access to outside media, the situation might be very like the one in Nepal in the 1970s, so no wonder that the king is the undisputed leader. Also, negative aspects of rulers become known to the outside world only when a revolution starts within the country. In any case, the slow progress towards democracy may help the country retain its power structure for many years to come.
Of course, the king chose to remain under the Indian umbrella, and in return got the big power plant that made the small contry with 0.5M population the fastest growing economy in South Asia (probably in the world too), with a growth beyond 20%. Comparing with the case of Nepal, it might not have been difficult for the Bhutanese king to decide everything for his small population, but it would probably be difficult for a Nepalese king to agree to close his embassy in china and to make sure that a coronation ceremony be attended only by the leaders of the southern neighbour. That said, it's however not at all acceptable that our power production remain below 500MW more than hudred years after the first commercial production, while there is a capacity for more than 40000MW.
|
|